The state by its action just changed the onus of the burden of proof. A criminal conviction would carry its weight of meeting the preponderance of evidence required in civil court. Now the plaintiff has to go through the process of making its case.
That also sets aside the court doing its job, which is to affirm the verdict until an appeal process overturns it. Now it simply negates the system of justice and the findings of the jury because it is inconvenient. Hey, if that damages the victims, their families, and any affected by negative financial consequences? Geez, sorry, but this was expedient.
And please don't argue the expense to the state. Governments piss away orders of magnitude of more money in waste and duplicity than these appeals could ever cost to play out.
.