I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
OofI don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
Sick burn. How about running a slant vs. on the sidelines?I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
Exactly. This isn't rocket surgery, people.I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
Hmmmmm.......Brian Mitchell, Sproles, Hester, the human joystick, Deion......... Should I continue?Exactly. This isn't rocket surgery, people.I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
Almost literally it represents an infinite increase in injury probability.Hmmmmm.......Brian Mitchell, Sproles, Hester, the human joystick, Deion......... Should I continue?Exactly. This isn't rocket surgery, people.I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
No more than lining up at wr or rb. How many times were those guys seriously injured doing it.Almost literally it represents an infinite increase in injury probability.Hmmmmm.......Brian Mitchell, Sproles, Hester, the human joystick, Deion......... Should I continue?Exactly. This isn't rocket surgery, people.I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
Why does that matter? They're not wrong. Returning punts is inherently more dangerous than not returning punts, period.No more than lining up at wr or rb. How many times were those guys seriously injured doing it.Almost literally it represents an infinite increase in injury probability.Hmmmmm.......Brian Mitchell, Sproles, Hester, the human joystick, Deion......... Should I continue?Exactly. This isn't rocket surgery, people.I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
One he does better than almost anyone in the game and one he is just another guy at.Sick burn. How about running a slant vs. on the sidelines?I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
lol.I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
I'm only seeing that as an assumption here. No proof has been shown. In fact, those guys represent the argument that it isn't. Freak accidents can happen on any given play. I'd say it's more prone to happen to less conditioned players.Why does that matter? They're not wrong. Returning punts is inherently more dangerous than not returning punts, period.No more than lining up at wr or rb. How many times were those guys seriously injured doing it.Almost literally it represents an infinite increase in injury probability.Hmmmmm.......Brian Mitchell, Sproles, Hester, the human joystick, Deion......... Should I continue?Exactly. This isn't rocket surgery, people.I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
playing WR is more dangerous than not playing WRWhy does that matter? They're not wrong. Returning punts is inherently more dangerous than not returning punts, period.No more than lining up at wr or rb. How many times were those guys seriously injured doing it.Almost literally it represents an infinite increase in injury probability.Hmmmmm.......Brian Mitchell, Sproles, Hester, the human joystick, Deion......... Should I continue?Exactly. This isn't rocket surgery, people.I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
I don't get what you're missing here. If you are returning a punt, you might get hurt. It doesn't matter what the odds are, because if you're standing on the sideline, you have 0% chance of getting hurt unless Tonya Harding is around. It's simple math.I'm only seeing that as an assumption here. No proof has been shown. In fact, those guys represent the argument that it isn't. Freak accidents can happen on any given play. I'd say it's more prone to happen to less conditioned players.Why does that matter? They're not wrong. Returning punts is inherently more dangerous than not returning punts, period.No more than lining up at wr or rb. How many times were those guys seriously injured doing it.Almost literally it represents an infinite increase in injury probability.Hmmmmm.......Brian Mitchell, Sproles, Hester, the human joystick, Deion......... Should I continue?Exactly. This isn't rocket surgery, people.I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
Vick has ALWAYS been a poor thrower.Considering how poor of a thrower Vick is these days, Pitt might as well use Brown on punts.
Sure. And Brown has a much higher chance to change the game at WR than he does at PR, so that's factored in. There's a reason the vast majority of teams stop letting their studs return punts eventually. Because not returning punts is automatically safer than returning punts, even if returning punts isn't that dangerous.playing WR is more dangerous than not playing WRWhy does that matter? They're not wrong. Returning punts is inherently more dangerous than not returning punts, period.No more than lining up at wr or rb. How many times were those guys seriously injured doing it.Almost literally it represents an infinite increase in injury probability.Hmmmmm.......Brian Mitchell, Sproles, Hester, the human joystick, Deion......... Should I continue?Exactly. This isn't rocket surgery, people.I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
so do you think there is a higher injury risk in playing Brown on a PR than on an average offensive play?Sure. And Brown has a much higher chance to change the game at WR than he does at PR, so that's factored in. There's a reason the vast majority of teams stop letting their studs return punts eventually. Because not returning punts is automatically safer than returning punts, even if returning punts isn't that dangerous.playing WR is more dangerous than not playing WRWhy does that matter? They're not wrong. Returning punts is inherently more dangerous than not returning punts, period.No more than lining up at wr or rb. How many times were those guys seriously injured doing it.Almost literally it represents an infinite increase in injury probability.Hmmmmm.......Brian Mitchell, Sproles, Hester, the human joystick, Deion......... Should I continue?Exactly. This isn't rocket surgery, people.I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
This is a conservative league. Last thing any HC wants is to be tarred and feathered because he got the game's best WR injured on a 7-yard punt return. Didn't that happen to Dez earlier in his career?
Well, I'm recognizing that we are arguing two different opinions here.I don't get what you're missing here. If you are returning a punt, you might get hurt. It doesn't matter what the odds are, because if you're standing on the sideline, you have 0% chance of getting hurt unless Tonya Harding is around. It's simple math.I'm only seeing that as an assumption here. No proof has been shown. In fact, those guys represent the argument that it isn't. Freak accidents can happen on any given play. I'd say it's more prone to happen to less conditioned players.Why does that matter? They're not wrong. Returning punts is inherently more dangerous than not returning punts, period.No more than lining up at wr or rb. How many times were those guys seriously injured doing it.Almost literally it represents an infinite increase in injury probability.Hmmmmm.......Brian Mitchell, Sproles, Hester, the human joystick, Deion......... Should I continue?Exactly. This isn't rocket surgery, people.I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
This is my argument.so do you think there is a higher injury risk in playing Brown on a PR than on an average offensive play?Sure. And Brown has a much higher chance to change the game at WR than he does at PR, so that's factored in. There's a reason the vast majority of teams stop letting their studs return punts eventually. Because not returning punts is automatically safer than returning punts, even if returning punts isn't that dangerous.playing WR is more dangerous than not playing WRWhy does that matter? They're not wrong. Returning punts is inherently more dangerous than not returning punts, period.No more than lining up at wr or rb. How many times were those guys seriously injured doing it.Almost literally it represents an infinite increase in injury probability.Hmmmmm.......Brian Mitchell, Sproles, Hester, the human joystick, Deion......... Should I continue?Exactly. This isn't rocket surgery, people.I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
This is a conservative league. Last thing any HC wants is to be tarred and feathered because he got the game's best WR injured on a 7-yard punt return. Didn't that happen to Dez earlier in his career?
When they needed a spark, sure. But not all the time. Desean Jackson has been used in a similar way.If your purpose in coaching your football team is to put the ball in the hands of your best player less in hopes of him not getting hurt you're probably not going to do very well. As a Ravens fan, I'm terrified of 84 anywhere on the field with the ball.
The Ravens used to let Ed Reed return punts when they needed a spark. Special players like that make special plays when they're needed most.
Why does Antonio Brown have a higher chance to change the game at WR than he does at PR? He averages 9.8 yards per punt return vs. 13.6 yards per reception, which isn't a huge difference. He averages 9.8 yards per punt return vs. 4.3 yards per route run (just this season- his career value is much lower). Yes, I know that it's not exactly an apples-to-oranges comparison, because that per-punt-return average doesn't include fair catches, but Antonio Brown isn't going to get injured on a fair catch, (whereas he might get injured running a route on a play where he's not targeted).Sure. And Brown has a much higher chance to change the game at WR than he does at PR, so that's factored in. There's a reason the vast majority of teams stop letting their studs return punts eventually. Because not returning punts is automatically safer than returning punts, even if returning punts isn't that dangerous.
This is a conservative league. Last thing any HC wants is to be tarred and feathered because he got the game's best WR injured on a 7-yard punt return. Didn't that happen to Dez earlier in his career?
Probably because they are good at it and because field position and not turning the ball over actually matters in real football. Just take your "magic football" glasses off for a second.Jason Seahorn anyone? The Giants learned fast.... not sure with Pitt is so far behind the times here
Sproles, DeSean Jackson, Landry, and A. Brown all doing it this year... Why are these guys returning punts???
Better watch that boy #### redneck.what now?My boy
87% of statistics are inherently made up and are 4x dumber than the truth. BTW, in case you missed it, Wheaton got hurt last night blocking. Obviously, the Steelers need to make sure AB isn't on the field any time he isn't going to catch a pass so the same thing doesn't happen to him.A WR can run a route and not get hit, so one punt return is roughly (and arbitrarily) equal to about 4 punt returns. So inherently a punt return is 4x more dangerous than running a route.
And if you're standing on the sideline you can't help your team win. If you're returning a punt, you can. Unless your goal is to make fantasy geeks happy instead of winning games, it's simple math.I don't get what you're missing here. If you are returning a punt, you might get hurt. It doesn't matter what the odds are, because if you're standing on the sideline, you have 0% chance of getting hurt unless Tonya Harding is around. It's simple math.I'm only seeing that as an assumption here. No proof has been shown. In fact, those guys represent the argument that it isn't. Freak accidents can happen on any given play. I'd say it's more prone to happen to less conditioned players.Why does that matter? They're not wrong. Returning punts is inherently more dangerous than not returning punts, period.No more than lining up at wr or rb. How many times were those guys seriously injured doing it.Almost literally it represents an infinite increase in injury probability.Hmmmmm.......Brian Mitchell, Sproles, Hester, the human joystick, Deion......... Should I continue?Exactly. This isn't rocket surgery, people.I don't have the data--but I assure you that the injury rate of somebody returning a punt is far higher than the injury rate of somebody on the sidelines watching the punt get returned by somebody else.Been asking for proof of higher injury rate on punt returns since I was logging on to Prodigy. Nobody's ever shown it to me.
Don't have a single one of those guys rostered.... just an observation.Probably because they are good at it and because field position and not turning the ball over actually matters in real football. Just take your "magic football" glasses off for a second.Jason Seahorn anyone? The Giants learned fast.... not sure with Pitt is so far behind the times here
Sproles, DeSean Jackson, Landry, and A. Brown all doing it this year... Why are these guys returning punts???
Pretty small sample size. Nobody has shown that Sehorn was more likely to be hurt returning than playing CB other than to say it happened. Where do you draw the line? Should Sehorn have always been on the bench when it was 3rd and 25 when the opponent was on their own 10 in the first half? I mean most of the time the offensive team runs it or throws a little dink pass to the RB. Why risk him getting hurt? How about in obvious running situations? Should Sehorn have been benched there too?Don't have a single one of those guys rostered.... just an observation.Probably because they are good at it and because field position and not turning the ball over actually matters in real football. Just take your "magic football" glasses off for a second.Jason Seahorn anyone? The Giants learned fast.... not sure with Pitt is so far behind the times here
Sproles, DeSean Jackson, Landry, and A. Brown all doing it this year... Why are these guys returning punts???
As a Giants fan I'll never forget how that ruined the potential of our best franchise CB's knee. He was never the same
How do you explain Isaac Bruce, Tim Brown, and Joey Galloway?You have the #1 (or #2 if you want to say Julio) receiver in the league and you're having him return punts? So dumb.
My boy should be getting manicures and massages on the sidelines when he's not catching a million catches each game.
I don't think you get my point. Not crunching numbers for this silly thread.87% of statistics are inherently made up and are 4x dumber than the truth. BTW, in case you missed it, Wheaton got hurt last night blocking. Obviously, the Steelers need to make sure AB isn't on the field any time he isn't going to catch a pass so the same thing doesn't happen to him.A WR can run a route and not get hit, so one punt return is roughly (and arbitrarily) equal to about 4 punt returns. So inherently a punt return is 4x more dangerous than running a route.
Or play in return yardage leagues! I'm certainly not complaining about Brown's game last night.parasaurolophus said:Probably because they are good at it and because field position and not turning the ball over actually matters in real football. Just take your "magic football" glasses off for a second.fbelange said:Jason Seahorn anyone? The Giants learned fast.... not sure with Pitt is so far behind the times here
Sproles, DeSean Jackson, Landry, and A. Brown all doing it this year... Why are these guys returning punts???
Was your point that 1 punt return = 4 punt returns?tone1oc said:I don't think you get my point. Not crunching numbers for this silly thread.apalmer said:87% of statistics are inherently made up and are 4x dumber than the truth. BTW, in case you missed it, Wheaton got hurt last night blocking. Obviously, the Steelers need to make sure AB isn't on the field any time he isn't going to catch a pass so the same thing doesn't happen to him.tone1oc said:A WR can run a route and not get hit, so one punt return is roughly (and arbitrarily) equal to about 4 punt returns. So inherently a punt return is 4x more dangerous than running a route.
Let punt return = p, receptions = r, routes run = u, and injury probability = xWas your point that 1 punt return = 4 punt returns?tone1oc said:I don't think you get my point. Not crunching numbers for this silly thread.apalmer said:87% of statistics are inherently made up and are 4x dumber than the truth. BTW, in case you missed it, Wheaton got hurt last night blocking. Obviously, the Steelers need to make sure AB isn't on the field any time he isn't going to catch a pass so the same thing doesn't happen to him.tone1oc said:A WR can run a route and not get hit, so one punt return is roughly (and arbitrarily) equal to about 4 punt returns. So inherently a punt return is 4x more dangerous than running a route.
tone1oc said:A WR can run a route and not get hit, so one punt return is roughly (and arbitrarily) equal to about 4 punt returns. So inherently a punt return is 4x more dangerous than running a route.
Yeah I never understand why the elite CBs don't just kneel down after making an INT. Why risk injury returning the ball?Don't have a single one of those guys rostered.... just an observation.parasaurolophus said:Probably because they are good at it and because field position and not turning the ball over actually matters in real football. Just take your "magic football" glasses off for a second.fbelange said:Jason Seahorn anyone? The Giants learned fast.... not sure with Pitt is so far behind the times here
Sproles, DeSean Jackson, Landry, and A. Brown all doing it this year... Why are these guys returning punts???
As a Giants fan I'll never forget how that ruined the potential of our best franchise CB's knee. He was never the same