Ya - tasker will almost certainly finish me off tonightSteve Tasker said:Nysfl and I are quickly approaching endgame.
NTTAWWTYa - tasker will almost certainly finish me off tonightSteve Tasker said:Nysfl and I are quickly approaching endgame.
So you disagree with me; you don't think it's a win for him after rook takes rook?Just looked over the game tim played with Otello. That king and pawn endgame was crazy, no way I would've traded down into that.
SureTim>can you post the game in just PGN without comments so I can plug it into a viewer?
Confirmed. You never gave me an opening to attack, and I don't have the patience for a slow defensive showdown.Steve Tasker def. Nysfl 0-1
Very evenly matched game. You had me scared ####less after 17. Qd2. I think we may have had a potential drawn position if you had retreated the queen rather than capturing with 30. cxd3. I would've struggled mightily to promote the pawn. I also wonder if you may have been able to win or force a draw with 23. Qd4+ rather than 23. f3. Once I was able to push 23. ... d4, I was able to get the rook in there.
All in all a fun game. Really had me on edge for awhile.
I'm curious what you were thinking with 15. Nxc6 as well. Not that it was a bad move, but I thought you had pretty much full control of the center with the knight posted there. I couldn't really attack it.Confirmed. You never gave me an opening to attack, and I don't have the patience for a slow defensive showdown.Steve Tasker def. Nysfl 0-1
Very evenly matched game. You had me scared ####less after 17. Qd2. I think we may have had a potential drawn position if you had retreated the queen rather than capturing with 30. cxd3. I would've struggled mightily to promote the pawn. I also wonder if you may have been able to win or force a draw with 23. Qd4+ rather than 23. f3. Once I was able to push 23. ... d4, I was able to get the rook in there.
All in all a fun game. Really had me on edge for awhile.
I'm going to go back to look at those moves and hopefully learn something. Obviously, the big swing was when I attacked with my bishop and you countered with the knight trade, but I probably missed some other opportunities.
Tasker's going to be a tough out.
I'd be interested in looking at this game.I'm curious what you were thinking with 15. Nxc6 as well. Not that it was a bad move, but I thought you had pretty much full control of the center with the knight posted there. I couldn't really attack it.Confirmed. You never gave me an opening to attack, and I don't have the patience for a slow defensive showdown.Steve Tasker def. Nysfl 0-1
Very evenly matched game. You had me scared ####less after 17. Qd2. I think we may have had a potential drawn position if you had retreated the queen rather than capturing with 30. cxd3. I would've struggled mightily to promote the pawn. I also wonder if you may have been able to win or force a draw with 23. Qd4+ rather than 23. f3. Once I was able to push 23. ... d4, I was able to get the rook in there.
All in all a fun game. Really had me on edge for awhile.
I'm going to go back to look at those moves and hopefully learn something. Obviously, the big swing was when I attacked with my bishop and you countered with the knight trade, but I probably missed some other opportunities.
Tasker's going to be a tough out.
I'd be interested in looking at this game.I'm curious what you were thinking with 15. Nxc6 as well. Not that it was a bad move, but I thought you had pretty much full control of the center with the knight posted there. I couldn't really attack it.Confirmed. You never gave me an opening to attack, and I don't have the patience for a slow defensive showdown.Steve Tasker def. Nysfl 0-1
Very evenly matched game. You had me scared ####less after 17. Qd2. I think we may have had a potential drawn position if you had retreated the queen rather than capturing with 30. cxd3. I would've struggled mightily to promote the pawn. I also wonder if you may have been able to win or force a draw with 23. Qd4+ rather than 23. f3. Once I was able to push 23. ... d4, I was able to get the rook in there.
All in all a fun game. Really had me on edge for awhile.
I'm going to go back to look at those moves and hopefully learn something. Obviously, the big swing was when I attacked with my bishop and you countered with the knight trade, but I probably missed some other opportunities.
Tasker's going to be a tough out.
Regarding the bolded, I doubt it.Steve Tasker def. Nysfl 0-1
Very evenly matched game. You had me scared ####less after 17. Qd2. I think we may have had a potential drawn position if you had retreated the queen rather than capturing with 30. cxd3. I would've struggled mightily to promote the pawn. I also wonder if you may have been able to win or force a draw with 23. Qd4+ rather than 23. f3. Once I was able to push 23. ... d4, I was able to get the rook in there.
All in all a fun game. Really had me on edge for awhile.
Gotta be some mistakes in this notation.SureTim>can you post the game in just PGN without comments so I can plug it into a viewer?
1. e4 d5
2. exd5 Qxd5
3. Nc3 Qa5
4. d4 Nf6
5. Nf3 Bf5
6. Ne5 c6
7. Bc4 e6
8. g4 Bg6
9. h4 Nbd7
10. Nxd7 Nxd7
11. h4 Be4
12. Rh3 h6
13. Bd2 Bh7
14. Qe2 Qc7
15. d5 cxd5
16. Nxd5 Qb8
17. Bf4 Bd6
18. Bxd6 Qxd6
19. 0-0-0 Qd8
20. Bb5 0-0
21. Ne7+ Kh8
22. Bxd7 Qf4+
23. Kb1 Qf6
24. Nd5 exd5
25. Rxd5 Rad8
26. Rd1 Qb6
27. Bf5 Rxd1+
28. Qxd1 Bxf5
29. gxf5 Qxf2
30. Rf3 Qf4
31. f6 gxf6
32. Rf1 Re8
33. b3 Qg3
34. Kb2 Qe5
35. Ka3 Qe2
36. Qd7 Qe7+
37. Qxe7+ Rxe7
38. Rxf6 Kg7
39. Rd6 f6
40. c4 Kf7
41. Kb4 Re5
42. Rd7+ Re7
43. Rxe7+ Kxe7.
44. Kc3 Ke6
45. Kd4 Kf5
46. Ke3 Kg4
47. a4 a5
48. c5 f5
49. b4 f4+
50. Kf2 axb4
51. c6 bxc6
52. a5 b3
53. a6 b2
54. a7 b1=Q
55. a8=Q Qb6+
56. Ke2 Qe3+
57. Kd1 Qd3+
58. Ke1 Qc3+
59. Kd1 Kxh5
60. Qe8+ Kg5
61. Qe7+ Qf6
62. Qc5+ Kg6
63. Qc2+ Kf7
64. Qa2+ Qe6
65. Qa7+ Kf6
66. Qd4+ Ke7
67. Qa7+ Qd7+
0-1
Where? I thought I copied it right.Gotta be some mistakes in this notation.SureTim>can you post the game in just PGN without comments so I can plug it into a viewer?
1. e4 d5
2. exd5 Qxd5
3. Nc3 Qa5
4. d4 Nf6
5. Nf3 Bf5
6. Ne5 c6
7. Bc4 e6
8. g4 Bg6
9. h4 Nbd7
10. Nxd7 Nxd7
11. h4 Be4
12. Rh3 h6
13. Bd2 Bh7
14. Qe2 Qc7
15. d5 cxd5
16. Nxd5 Qb8
17. Bf4 Bd6
18. Bxd6 Qxd6
19. 0-0-0 Qd8
20. Bb5 0-0
21. Ne7+ Kh8
22. Bxd7 Qf4+
23. Kb1 Qf6
24. Nd5 exd5
25. Rxd5 Rad8
26. Rd1 Qb6
27. Bf5 Rxd1+
28. Qxd1 Bxf5
29. gxf5 Qxf2
30. Rf3 Qf4
31. f6 gxf6
32. Rf1 Re8
33. b3 Qg3
34. Kb2 Qe5
35. Ka3 Qe2
36. Qd7 Qe7+
37. Qxe7+ Rxe7
38. Rxf6 Kg7
39. Rd6 f6
40. c4 Kf7
41. Kb4 Re5
42. Rd7+ Re7
43. Rxe7+ Kxe7.
44. Kc3 Ke6
45. Kd4 Kf5
46. Ke3 Kg4
47. a4 a5
48. c5 f5
49. b4 f4+
50. Kf2 axb4
51. c6 bxc6
52. a5 b3
53. a6 b2
54. a7 b1=Q
55. a8=Q Qb6+
56. Ke2 Qe3+
57. Kd1 Qd3+
58. Ke1 Qc3+
59. Kd1 Kxh5
60. Qe8+ Kg5
61. Qe7+ Qf6
62. Qc5+ Kg6
63. Qc2+ Kf7
64. Qa2+ Qe6
65. Qa7+ Kf6
66. Qd4+ Ke7
67. Qa7+ Qd7+
0-1
Yeah, I actually just spent a few minutes really looking at it and I think I'm okay there. I didn't really consider it too highly when I played d3, but I remember thinking after playing the move that I failed to consider the implications of a queen retreat.Regarding the bolded, I doubt it.Steve Tasker def. Nysfl 0-1
Very evenly matched game. You had me scared ####less after 17. Qd2. I think we may have had a potential drawn position if you had retreated the queen rather than capturing with 30. cxd3. I would've struggled mightily to promote the pawn. I also wonder if you may have been able to win or force a draw with 23. Qd4+ rather than 23. f3. Once I was able to push 23. ... d4, I was able to get the rook in there.
All in all a fun game. Really had me on edge for awhile.
You have h4 twice for starters.Where? I thought I copied it right.Gotta be some mistakes in this notation.SureTim>can you post the game in just PGN without comments so I can plug it into a viewer?
1. e4 d5
2. exd5 Qxd5
3. Nc3 Qa5
4. d4 Nf6
5. Nf3 Bf5
6. Ne5 c6
7. Bc4 e6
8. g4 Bg6
9. h4 Nbd7
10. Nxd7 Nxd7
11. h4 Be4
12. Rh3 h6
13. Bd2 Bh7
14. Qe2 Qc7
15. d5 cxd5
16. Nxd5 Qb8
17. Bf4 Bd6
18. Bxd6 Qxd6
19. 0-0-0 Qd8
20. Bb5 0-0
21. Ne7+ Kh8
22. Bxd7 Qf4+
23. Kb1 Qf6
24. Nd5 exd5
25. Rxd5 Rad8
26. Rd1 Qb6
27. Bf5 Rxd1+
28. Qxd1 Bxf5
29. gxf5 Qxf2
30. Rf3 Qf4
31. f6 gxf6
32. Rf1 Re8
33. b3 Qg3
34. Kb2 Qe5
35. Ka3 Qe2
36. Qd7 Qe7+
37. Qxe7+ Rxe7
38. Rxf6 Kg7
39. Rd6 f6
40. c4 Kf7
41. Kb4 Re5
42. Rd7+ Re7
43. Rxe7+ Kxe7.
44. Kc3 Ke6
45. Kd4 Kf5
46. Ke3 Kg4
47. a4 a5
48. c5 f5
49. b4 f4+
50. Kf2 axb4
51. c6 bxc6
52. a5 b3
53. a6 b2
54. a7 b1=Q
55. a8=Q Qb6+
56. Ke2 Qe3+
57. Kd1 Qd3+
58. Ke1 Qc3+
59. Kd1 Kxh5
60. Qe8+ Kg5
61. Qe7+ Qf6
62. Qc5+ Kg6
63. Qc2+ Kf7
64. Qa2+ Qe6
65. Qa7+ Kf6
66. Qd4+ Ke7
67. Qa7+ Qd7+
0-1
You're right. The second one is h5. Thanks.You have h4 twice for starters.Where? I thought I copied it right.Gotta be some mistakes in this notation.SureTim>can you post the game in just PGN without comments so I can plug it into a viewer?
1. e4 d5
2. exd5 Qxd5
3. Nc3 Qa5
4. d4 Nf6
5. Nf3 Bf5
6. Ne5 c6
7. Bc4 e6
8. g4 Bg6
9. h4 Nbd7
10. Nxd7 Nxd7
11. h5 Be4
12. Rh3 h6
13. Bd2 Bh7
14. Qe2 Qc7
15. d5 cxd5
16. Nxd5 Qb8
17. Bf4 Bd6
18. Bxd6 Qxd6
19. 0-0-0 Qd8
20. Bb5 0-0
21. Ne7+ Kh8
22. Bxd7 Qf4+
23. Kb1 Qf6
24. Nd5 exd5
25. Rxd5 Rad8
26. Rd1 Qb6
27. Bf5 Rxd1+
28. Qxd1 Bxf5
29. gxf5 Qxf2
30. Rf3 Qf4
31. f6 gxf6
32. Rf1 Re8
33. b3 Qg3
34. Kb2 Qe5
35. Ka3 Qe2
36. Qd7 Qe7+
37. Qxe7+ Rxe7
38. Rxf6 Kg7
39. Rd6 f6
40. c4 Kf7
41. Kb4 Re5
42. Rd7+ Re7
43. Rxe7+ Kxe7.
44. Kc3 Ke6
45. Kd4 Kf5
46. Ke3 Kg4
47. a4 a5
48. c5 f5
49. b4 f4+
50. Kf2 axb4
51. c6 bxc6
52. a5 b3
53. a6 b2
54. a7 b1=Q
55. a8=Q Qb6+
56. Ke2 Qe3+
57. Kd1 Qd3+
58. Ke1 Qc3+
59. Kd1 Kxh5
60. Qe8+ Kg5
61. Qe7+ Qf6
62. Qc5+ Kg6
63. Qc2+ Kf7
64. Qa2+ Qe6
65. Qa7+ Kf6
66. Qd4+ Ke7
67. Qa7+ Qd7+
0-1
Still not right..You're right. The second one is h5. Thanks.You have h4 twice for starters.Where? I thought I copied it right.Gotta be some mistakes in this notation.SureTim>can you post the game in just PGN without comments so I can plug it into a viewer?
1. e4 d5
2. exd5 Qxd5
3. Nc3 Qa5
4. d4 Nf6
5. Nf3 Bf5
6. Ne5 c6
7. Bc4 e6
8. g4 Bg6
9. h4 Nbd7
10. Nxd7 Nxd7
11. h5 Be4
12. Rh3 h6
13. Bd2 Bh7
14. Qe2 Qc7
15. d5 cxd5
16. Nxd5 Qb8
17. Bf4 Bd6
18. Bxd6 Qxd6
19. 0-0-0 Qd8
20. Bb5 0-0
21. Ne7+ Kh8
22. Bxd7 Qf4+
23. Kb1 Qf6
24. Nd5 exd5
25. Rxd5 Rad8
26. Rd1 Qb6
27. Bf5 Rxd1+
28. Qxd1 Bxf5
29. gxf5 Qxf2
30. Rf3 Qf4
31. f6 gxf6
32. Rf1 Re8
33. b3 Qg3
34. Kb2 Qe5
35. Ka3 Qe2
36. Qd7 Qe7+
37. Qxe7+ Rxe7
38. Rxf6 Kg7
39. Rd6 f6
40. c4 Kf7
41. Kb4 Re5
42. Rd7+ Re7
43. Rxe7+ Kxe7.
44. Kc3 Ke6
45. Kd4 Kf5
46. Ke3 Kg4
47. a4 a5
48. c5 f5
49. b4 f4+
50. Kf2 axb4
51. c6 bxc6
52. a5 b3
53. a6 b2
54. a7 b1=Q
55. a8=Q Qb6+
56. Ke2 Qe3+
57. Kd1 Qd3+
58. Ke1 Qc3+
59. Kd1 Kxh5
60. Qe8+ Kg5
61. Qe7+ Qf6
62. Qc5+ Kg6
63. Qc2+ Kf7
64. Qa2+ Qe6
65. Qa7+ Kf6
66. Qd4+ Ke7
67. Qa7+ Qd7+
0-1
OK, quick thoughts:
1. Like Steve. I don't get 15. Nxd6. The knight's in a fine position there. I would have continued with development- Bf4 or Bg5, followed by Rc1 with the idea of c4.
I don't recall my exact thoughts, but I was very worried about losing the battle of the pawn there and all hell breaking loose. Probably too much so.
2. Bh6 was a mistake because it loses the pawn and creates a terrible king side pawn structure. If you want to play it, maybe play Kh1 first?
Pure mistake. I didn't see the knight counter, and I won any combination of bishop trades. Was obviously trying to get my knight and queen in position to attack his king/pawn structure. Plain and simple, that's where the game was lost.
3. Bc4 (Black's 25th move)- just a beautiful move. I love simplicity in chess- wish I could do it myself. Here you recognize that your position is superior, so rather than attempt some dazzling kingside attack, you take away his most dangerous piece and start trading pieces which will surely force a winning endgame.
4. Love d3 as well. Beautiful move.
Great game by Tasker, but it was pretty much over after Bh6.
His queen has no real good retreat squares. Even if you don't promote the d3 pawn, his c2 and b3 pawns are going to fall and you get a new passed pawn on b4 shortly after.Yeah, I actually just spent a few minutes really looking at it and I think I'm okay there. I didn't really consider it too highly when I played d3, but I remember thinking after playing the move that I failed to consider the implications of a queen retreat.Regarding the bolded, I doubt it.Steve Tasker def. Nysfl 0-1
Very evenly matched game. You had me scared ####less after 17. Qd2. I think we may have had a potential drawn position if you had retreated the queen rather than capturing with 30. cxd3. I would've struggled mightily to promote the pawn. I also wonder if you may have been able to win or force a draw with 23. Qd4+ rather than 23. f3. Once I was able to push 23. ... d4, I was able to get the rook in there.
All in all a fun game. Really had me on edge for awhile.
I found this on line, hope it helps:What do you guys do with that? Plug it into some software and it compiles the match for you?
Yup, I noticed this too. It's not an intuitive move, but it's the proper one. White is clearly winning after Nc8.In Tim's posted game, I think 24. N-c8 jumped out at me as a better move. White is up a solid exchange at that point, rather than giving the piece back for a pawn. I haven't finished going through it yet, though.
I found this on line, hope it helps:What do you guys do with that? Plug it into some software and it compiles the match for you?
http://chesstempo.com/pgn-viewer.html
I can't get Tim's game to load. Can someone post the corrected pgn?Yup, I noticed this too. It's not an intuitive move, but it's the proper one. White is clearly winning after Nc8.In Tim's posted game, I think 24. N-c8 jumped out at me as a better move. White is up a solid exchange at that point, rather than giving the piece back for a pawn. I haven't finished going through it yet, though.
What otello posted worked for me in the link you gave me.I can't get Tim's game to load. Can someone post the corrected pgn?Yup, I noticed this too. It's not an intuitive move, but it's the proper one. White is clearly winning after Nc8.In Tim's posted game, I think 24. N-c8 jumped out at me as a better move. White is up a solid exchange at that point, rather than giving the piece back for a pawn. I haven't finished going through it yet, though.
I strongly considered that move. I saw it as giving up a b and an n for an r. In retrospect, the wrong decision.Yup, I noticed this too. It's not an intuitive move, but it's the proper one. White is clearly winning after Nc8.In Tim's posted game, I think 24. N-c8 jumped out at me as a better move. White is up a solid exchange at that point, rather than giving the piece back for a pawn. I haven't finished going through it yet, though.
Ah. lol Didn't realize it was the same game.What otello posted worked for me in the link you gave me.I can't get Tim's game to load. Can someone post the corrected pgn?Yup, I noticed this too. It's not an intuitive move, but it's the proper one. White is clearly winning after Nc8.In Tim's posted game, I think 24. N-c8 jumped out at me as a better move. White is up a solid exchange at that point, rather than giving the piece back for a pawn. I haven't finished going through it yet, though.
Re: the opening, this is the first time I've ever played Sicilian (and I'm sure many of you frequent Sicilian players are laughing at my opening). I was very, very lost early on and was never certain whether I would be able to play d5 and be safe with it.SacramentoBob said:Just a couple of quick comments since it's late.
1. e4 e6 2. Bc4 c5?
2... d5 will be the easiest French defense you've ever played.
3. exd5 exd5 4. Bb3 and all the traditional problems with the French are solved. No cramping, you can freely develop your pieces and you already have an advantage.
c5 basically justifies his early bishop move as you transpose into something a little more normal now.
3. Nc3 a6
I realize you were trying to get a cheapo in here, but standard development of Nf6, followed by d5 gets a nice center with tempo.
4. d3 b5 5. Bb3 Bb7 6. a4 b4 7. Nce2 Nc6 8. Nf3 g6
You sure like those pawn moves...
9. O-O Bg7 10. d4 cxd4 11. Nexd4
Loses a pawn. See that nice undefended morsel on e4? You have a forcing sequence of moves that allows you to capture it for free. It's not a big tactic, you just have to figure out a way to attack the pawn at the same time he has to respond to another, bigger threat...
Nge7 12. Re1 O-O 13. h3 d5 14. e5 Qc7 15. Nxc6 Nxc6 16. Bf4 a5 17. Qd2 Rfd8
5/5 dentists would develop their rook to the half-open c file here.
18. Rac1 Rac8 19. Bh6 Nxe5
You saw this combo.
20. Bxg7 Nxf3+ 21. gxf3 Kxg7 22. f4 Qc6 23. f3 d4 24. Rf1 Ba6 25. Rf2 Bc4 26. Bxc4 Qxc4 27. b3 Qd5
All roads lead to Rome at this point.
28.Rd1 Rc3 29. Kg2 d3 30. cxd3 Qxb3 31. Qa2 Qxd1 32. Qe2 Qxe2 33. Rxe2 Rdxd3 34.Rf2 Kf6 35. Kg3 Kf5 36. h4 0-1
I mentioned this in my analysis. I very likely would have resigned.Why 22. BxN instead of 22. RxN?
I don't like this capture here. You're helping him conduct his attack. There's no rush to take the d5 pawn and you need to get your king off of the e-file. O-O-O is playable here, although it involves a pawn sacrifice. Pawns are worth less than the king, so it's certainly something to consider and White can go wrong if he captures with the queen instead of the bishop.1. e4 d5
2. exd5 Qxd5
3. Nc3 Qa5
4. d4 Nf6
5. Nf3 Bf5
6. Ne5 c6
7. Bc4 e6
8. g4 Bg6
9. h4 Nbd7
10. Nxd7 Nxd7
11. h4 Be4
12. Rh3 h6
13. Bd2 Bh7
14. Qe2 Qc7
15. d5 cxd5
17. Bb5 and White sets a record for most pieces pinned against a king. Black is probably lost here.16. Nxd5 Qb8
17. Bf4 Bd6
You know those instructive games you read about where one of the players keeps his king in the center despite multiple opportunities to castle and the other player gets a devastating attack because of it. Yeah, this is one of them. I realize you were trying to get away from the discovered attack on your queen after the knight move, but after O-O-O it's a harmless threat. The knight only has one move where it's not lost outright and that's e3.18. Bxd6 Qxd6
19. 0-0-0 Qd8
27... Qxf2 28. Qf1 Bxf5 29. gxf5 Qxf5! The queen is left hanging for 3 moves and can never be captured! I've been in those games where you've been hanging on by a thread for an hour then suddenly your opponent gives you an out and you breath a sigh of relief at the prospect of a draw. But never stop looking to win even when you're losing. In fact, you have to look for it more when losing because you have nothing to lose at that point.20. Bb5! 0-0
21. Ne7+ Kh8
22. Bxd7 Qf4+
23. Kb1 Qf6
24. Nd5 exd5
25. Rxd5 Rad8
26. Rd1 Qb6
27. Bf5 Rxd1+
If I were White, I'd agree to a draw if offered here. My queenside pawns aren't advanced enough to try for an advantage and my weak kingside pawns would be a concern. It's probably equal, but I could see it turning against me if I play poorly.28. Qxd1 Bxf5
29. gxf5 Qxf2
30. Rf3 Qf4
Very clever!31. f6
Ka3 looks pretty risky for White.31... gxf6
32. Rf1 Re8
33. b3 Qg3
34. Kb2 Qe5
35. Ka3 Qe2
The notorious drawish rook endgame. I'll take the passed f-pawn with White's king far away from the action. I'd probably accept a draw as White but play on as Black.36. Qd7 Qe7+
37. Qxe7+ Rxe7
38. Rxf6 Kg7
That little voice inside White's head should be saying "get King Camarillo active".39. Rd6 f6
40. c4
You have a passed pawn and White hasn't bothered to attack it. Push the pawn!40... Kf7
Why are you "going for the draw" here? If you wanted to draw, you could've just offered one. Also, like I said in the other thread, always consider the consequences of trading down into a king and pawn endgame. If you don't like what you see, avoid it. You're better off being down a pawn in a rook endgame than being "equal" materially in a lost king and pawn end game.41. Kb4 Re5?
As will be seen, Re5 was an error. At the time I was going for a draw. I figured that after Rd7+ Re7 Rd6 Re5 we would have a draw. However, what I didn't see was that Rxe7 is actually winning for White. What I should have played was Rc7 allowing me to move my king to e7. (I also briefly considered f5?? Rxh6 f4. But the problem is that after trading rooks white's king can reach the f pawn in time and I am lost.)
This is what makes king and pawn endgames so easy and so hard. They require exact calculation, you can't just play by feel. If you do the latter you can turn a win into a loss in a hurry. It's generally pretty easy to calculate them as there aren't a lot of moves to consider though. Very instructive game though.42. Rd7+ Re7
44. Kc3 Ke6
Now at this point white needs to start advancing the queenside pawns RIGHT NOW. He needs to play b4, c5, b5, c6, and after I capture and he captures back, c7 and c8. That's 6 moves. I calculated this, and discovered I don't have time to capture white's h pawn and get back and capture that c pawn. And if I can't capture the h-pawn, white will eventually capture MY h pawn and win. However...
You don't have time to get back.45. Kd4 Kf5
Kd4 was the error. Now after playing Kf5 I have time to get back: b4, Kg4, c5, Kxh5, b5, Kg6 and my king gets back in time, and the TWO passed pawns on the kingside are enough to occupy black's king while I finish off white's queenside pawns and win the game with my a pawn.
While a4 is certainly a bad move on general principle (you don't want to allow your opponent to lock down your pawn majority), Ke3 was the losing move. White has to get his pawn majority mobilized and delaying that ONE extra move allows the Black king to get back and defend and White's king can never stop two passed pawns with a file in between them (this is good general king and pawn knowledge and is the next step after the lesson I gave in the other thread). Black's king can go back to the queen side with impunity and White can never do anything on the king side.46. Ke3 Kg4
47. a4 a5
Otello felt a4 was an error, but a5 is also questionable. I force a situation where I will queen, but it allows white to queen as well, which may lead to a draw. Perhaps I should have just taken the h-pawn instead and then moved my king back to the queenside. But now I was worried after a4 that he might be able to create a protected passed pawn, which would cause me to lose the game.
otello has played this endgame remarkably well. If that was all instinct, we have a Capablanca on our hands.48. c5 f5
49. b4 f4+
50. Kf2 axb4
51. c6 bxc6
52. a5 b3
53. a6 b2
54. a7 b1=Q
A little silly to go after pawns with Kxh5 when you're trying to prevent a perpetual.55. a8=Q Qb6+
56. Ke2 Qe3+
57. Kd1 Qd3+
58. Ke1 Qc3+
Hoping for Kf1 here, Kf3! wins
59. Kd1 Kxh5
Now the trick is to try and force a trade of queens. So long as I can do this with at least 2 of the pawns left, I win. But Otello makes it difficult, and if he hadn't blundered in a few moves, I'm not sure if I can accomplish this.
60. Qe8+ Kg5
61. Qe7+ Qf6
62. Qc5+ Kg6
63. Qc2+ Kf7
64. Qa2+ Qe6
65. Qa7+ Kf6
66. Qd4+ Ke7
67. Qa7+? Qd7+
And the queens get traded, white wins. And I breathed a major sigh of relief. Otello played a great game. I was very lucky to win.