Anyone watching the Arizona game? Does Stepfan Taylor look as bad as his stat line would suggest? I noticed that the other RB there had an even worse YPC tonight. Blocking issues?
The sooner people give up their hopes of him ever being a feature RB the better.
He can't play. One feature of good runners is that they can run. Taylor can't do that and as a result his attempts to run appear less successful than runs from runners who can run. The thing about running for a running back is that it's important to be able to do it. As you scout him, note that as he attempts to run, he doesn't move fast enough for it to qualify as running. I've seen faster people at alumni over 40 games. "Sure," you might say, "but you've seen slower people in your life too," and I confess that's true, but it's usually people who do those wheelbarrow races and try to run with their hands or piano movers with a full load going up the last flight of stairs in an apartment building.
I think he has similar speed to Alfred Morris?it isn't obvious why a guy with effectively the same speed could be among the league leaders in rushing yards, yet it will be impossible for Taylor to have success...
doesn't compute...
I'll say it again. Morris has ferocious power and football smarts. Taylor has no power. I'm not sure if he has the smarts. He doesn't impress me.
zero seems to be a theme with you...
when the contention that he has no speed was met (bettered 4.7 combine time to 4.65 pro day), than the ground shifts to no power...
yet he broke many tackles en route to being stanford career rushing yardage leader...
again, STILL doesn't compute...
There is more to comparing RBs than just speed. Comparing a guy who just ran for 20/64 in the first preseason game to another RB who rushed for 1600 yds as a rookie is something that in my mind does not compute.
Before your last post though, I was also going to say their situations are totally different. First, the Skins OL is one of the best in the NFL, Zona's is one of the worst. Skins have one of the best/most dangerous QBs in the league, Zona has a bottom 1/3, washed up QB. On top of all that, Taylor may not even be the 2nd string RB on his team which is worse in comparison.
Im not getting this Taylor hype at all, at least for fantasy purposes.
i disagreed that taylor has no speed or no power, wasn't trying to hype him...
nobody is saying you should draft taylor as RB1, in redraft or dynasty, where you can get him, he could present value (possibly as handcuff to mendenhall)...
he could be third in line, or second in line or even start... the point is that mendenhall and ryan williams were gimpy last year, and they are still having trouble with their knees...
these are really separate questions, though, and it is important to answer both...
if he has no chance at an opportunity (not my position), it doesn't matter much how talented he is is, barring injury (at least in redraft)...
if he has no talent (also not my position), opportunity is irrelevant (even in dynasty)...
comparing speed of taylor and morris was in response to some seemingly implying it would be impossible for taylor to suceed because of his lack of speed... several examples were used of RBs who had some level of success with same speed, morris was one... surely many of us could come up with other RBs that didn't run sub-4.6 but had high level of success...
as a future reference, house cleaning type of qualifier, when i make a speed comparison, i don't put forth disclaimers that i am not saying the prospect in question is completely identical in every way involving every possible attribute or trait (or their situation is completely identical in every possible way), as this seems so obvious it would be tedious to note it every time, but perhaps it was needed here?
agree with last year's ARI OL... but cooper and warmack were among best interior OL prospects in general and guard prospects specifically in past decade (not often that two guards go in top 10), so i'm not assuming they will automatically be just as bad as they were in 2012...
true that palmer is not as good as RGIII, not many are, he was historically good, broke several rookie records... but i think that palmer will be in a better position to suceed in ARI than he was in OAK, so he isn't necessarily doomed to finish in bottom 10 statistically... would you concur that fitzgerald (probable first ballot HoFer), floyd (arguably best WR from class of '12, especially with blackmon imploding) and roberts are better than whoever he had in OAK... and that might position him to do better than he did in OAK?