What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Saagar Enjeti: I Said Gas Prices More Important Than Jan 6, Liberals LOST IT (6/16/22 5:57 PST) (1 Viewer)

GordonGekko

Footballguy
**VIDEO**: Saagar Enjeti: I Said Gas Prices More Important Than Jan 6, Liberals LOST IT Jun 13, 2022 Breaking Points

Saagar defends his provocative claim about gas prices reaching $5/gallon being more important than Jan 6th hearings and points out the revealing priorities of liberals in media

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOwXEhsnsAo

TWEET: Saagar Enjeti XX@XXesaagar

Gas is 5 DOLLARS A GALLON people. Genuinely can't imagine giving a sh!t about about these Jan 6 hearings

1:20 PM · Jun 9, 2022

https://twitter.com/esaagar/status/1534993835402706973

VIDEO: American Families Struggle To Survive As Inflation And Gas Prices Soar Jun 12, 2022

Gas prices hit $5 a gallon nationwide this weekend while inflation rose by the fastest rate in decades. NBC News’ Kate Snow follows three American families forced to make lifestyle changes just to make ends meet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuPpHQIhHfM

Direct Headline: The Uncredible Jan. 6 Committee

Americans needed a serious accounting. Democrats assured they won’t get one....This week’s Washington corollary to the tree-in-the-forest thought experiment: If the Jan. 6 committee holds professionally polished hearings, amid wall-to-wall prime-time coverage, will anybody pay attention? If the answer is no, the committee will largely have itself to blame...The prospect of public apathy is already deeply vexing the establishment. "Democrats have the steep challenge of convincing a disillusioned American electorate to tune into” the hearings, Politico worries. The Washington Post frets that even weeks of this miniseries may not “change hearts or minds.” The vexed are already laying blame. It’s the fault of Republicans who will “downplay” the findings (to) Americans who are too focused on gasoline prices....

...What’s actually missing in this special sauce of prime TV hours, slick videos and positive press is the one ingredient truly vital for public interest: credibility. If huge swathes of America ignore the committee’s work, it will be because the committee itself—through its construction and through its actions—made it easy...Can Americans trust the findings of a panel whose members began with a preconceived narrative and blackballed any dissenting voices? Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s unprecedented decision to veto Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s picks last July in favor of her own handpicked Republican members blew the committee’s credibility before it even started work. Americans will find it easy to reject “evidence” that is too fragile to bear the scrutiny of fellow House members.....

....And consider Mrs. Pelosi’s Democratic picks. California’s Adam Schiff is the House face of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax and secret Ukraine impeachment proceedings. Maryland’s Jamie Raskin knows a little something about objecting to the counting of electoral votes. On Jan. 6, 2017, he objected to Donald Trump’s Florida victory. Mrs. Pelosi had more than 200 Democratic members to choose from, yet her picks allow Americans to dismiss the committee instantly....The committee might have redeemed itself even with this makeup had it conducted its work in a sober, professional manner. Instead, within months, it had become the worst type of Washington leak machine—dribbling documents, texts, emails and inside tidbits about who was up for a grilling next and what was coming out of depositions....

...This practice reached a low in March...The committee’s initial directive to telecom and social media companies to preserve the communications of private citizens—including members of Congress—but to keep the targets in the dark so they’d have no opportunity to litigate. The flurry of criminal referrals to the Justice Department with no debate over whether those accused might have legitimate claims of executive privilege....Finally, how can Americans be asked to trust a committee whose work Democrats are openly broadcasting as a political operation? “Jan 6. Hearings Give Democrats a Chance to Recast Midterm Message,” explains the New York Times, noting that the party hopes to change the subject from the Biden White House’s mounting liabilities—which include roaring inflation, a porous border, soaring crime, and a baby formula shortage. Republicans last year darkly hinted that this was the real purpose of the committee, and leave it to Democrats to make that case for them. It didn’t have to be this way. Each of these decisions was deliberate, and each was an obvious exercise in self-sabotage....

By Kimberley A. Strassel June 9, 2022 6:06 pm ET

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-uncredible-jan-6-committee-midterms-pelosi-cheney-schiff-miniseries-republicans-11654811166

*********

Enjeti points out that the current Democratic Party has decided that their version of "Democracy" means it's more important to focus on J6 while ignoring the critical mass of the needs and suffering of every day working class Americans, who want to know why their version of populist "democracy" is being completely ignored. He illustrates the importance of winning elections to have your Party build the kind of America that it wants to see become reality. Thus if you lose by failing the people and failing to have them vote for you, then that's on you and you alone. There is no one else to blame.

And that the only answer, to this clear indifference, is that the current Biden Administration has no plan and no desire to help actual working class people. Because there clearly is no plan and no strategy in place to do so.

As one of the mothers says in the 2nd video, she lives in terror each and every day thinking that none of this madness is going to get better. That's the loss of actual hope. And for what purpose? Top-Down political platforming is having elected officials decide what should matter to the people, even if those talking points, public policies, executive orders, laws and enforcement punishes their very basic survival. This is what the current Biden Administration is using right now. "We decide what should matter to you, your concerns are nonsensical because it doesn't approximate our day to day reality from the elite and privilege point of view"  This kind of thinking is the bread and butter zones of authoritarian regimes.

So who has the misguided priorities here?

Every day working class American families worry about finding baby formula and putting food on the table. Not anything near, as the WSJ article points out, the same worries of the current Democratic Party using the J6 hearings as an open partisan deflection to desperately attempt to reset their Mid Term messaging platform. 

Are gasoline prices more important to you than J6?

What are the host of current issues that are more important to you than J6?

For those of you who see J6 as more paramount, can you explain why to everyone?  Could you explain it to working class families a paycheck and half away from being homeless?

I'll leave this here for others to discuss.

 
J6 was a riot.  Gas prices are gonna cripple the American economy.    It's not on the same planet.    Gas and inflation are "real" threats.   

 
This is another example of the extremes of each party yelling the loudest. There is nothing wrong with what he said.

Saagar is actually a very balanced commentator in my opinion. He is about as middle of the road as you're going to get in this industry. 

 
Trump's own White House lawyer suggested crimes may have been committed by those around the President. They should be investigated and prosecuted for all crimes if found guilty.

Law and order and such.

 
Imagine being so 

The $5 hits a lot of people immediately, but the 1/6 deal has long-lasting effects on our country.  

Pick your poison.
Thank you. It seems some aren't willing to walk and chew gum at the same time; likely because one makes their tribe look bad. 

 
Trump's own White House lawyer suggested crimes may have been committed by those around the President. They should be investigated and prosecuted for all crimes if found guilty.

Law and order and such.
Well, it's obvious our red shirted "patriots" still support law and order and are merely looking to move on from this unsubstantiated witch hunt. I'm sure if the roles were reversed and a losing Democratic president appeared to incite a movement to overturn their votes, they'd be just as quick to want to move on. Hypocrites these "patriots" are not.

 
Well, it's obvious our red shirted "patriots" still support law and order and are merely looking to move on from this unsubstantiated witch hunt. I'm sure if the roles were reversed and a losing Democratic president appeared to incite a movement to overturn their votes, they'd be just as quick to want to move on. Hypocrites these "patriots" are not.


VIDEO: Former Kamala (Spokeswoman) SCOLDS Americans Mad About Gas Prices | Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar Jun 16, 2022

Krystal and Saagar criticize MSNBC host and former Kamala (spokeswoman) Symone Sanders for taking issue with the Americans worrying about gas prices instead of the Jan 6 hearings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDQxbx9dZLU

********

Enjeti points out - If you want the masses to care about J6, then don't demand people to ignore their immediate material needs for "high minded ideals". Then just FIX THE GAS PROBLEM FIRST, then you can create a pathway for the working class to give a damn.

Ball points out - When every day people are struggling for survival today, no one has energy left to deal with J6. And the only Team Blue response to those concerns and having the gall to have "different priorities" is to shame people.

Both point out that the 2nd night of the J6 hearings watched it's audience CUT IN HALF. This is with widespread prime time coverage and a coordinated push by literally every major broadcast network in the country plus the full weight of most of Big Social Media behind it.

 
VIDEO: Former Kamala (Spokeswoman) SCOLDS Americans Mad About Gas Prices | Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar Jun 16, 2022

Krystal and Saagar criticize MSNBC host and former Kamala (spokeswoman) Symone Sanders for taking issue with the Americans worrying about gas prices instead of the Jan 6 hearings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDQxbx9dZLU

********

Enjeti points out - If you want the masses to care about J6, then don't demand people to ignore their immediate material needs for "high minded ideals". Then just FIX THE GAS PROBLEM FIRST, then you can create a pathway for the working class to give a damn.

Ball points out - When every day people are struggling for survival today, no one has energy left to deal with J6. And the only Team Blue response to those concerns and having the gall to have "different priorities" is to shame people.

Both point out that the 2nd night of the J6 hearings watched it's audience CUT IN HALF. This is with widespread prime time coverage and a coordinated push by literally every major broadcast network in the country plus the full weight of most of Big Social Media behind it.
WTH does that have to do with me? It's sad that a) you spend so much time consuming the opinion of others and b) think distributing it will change minds.

If you want to have an impact on others, showcase yourself as a decent, reasonable person capable of humility. Acting as just another propaganda troll only works against you.

 



Direct Headline: Jan. 6 Hearings Give Democrats a Chance to Recast Midterm Message

With their majority at stake, Democrats plan to use the six high-profile hearings to refocus voters’ attention...With their control of Congress hanging in the balance, Democrats plan to use made-for-television moments and a carefully choreographed rollout of revelations over the course of six hearings to remind the public of the magnitude of Mr. Trump’s effort to overturn the election, and to persuade voters that the coming midterm elections are a chance to hold Republicans accountable for it.....

It is an uphill battle at a time when polls show that voters’ attention is focused elsewhere, including on inflation, rising coronavirus cases and record-high gas prices. But Democrats argue the hearings will give them a platform for making a broader case about why they deserve to stay in power....And Democrats are up against the reality that the raw emotions in the aftermath of the attack have faded, even among voters who care about the facts, as attention has turned to an ongoing war in Ukraine, gun violence at home and a deep pessimism about the state of the economy....Their task is to persuade voters that the Jan. 6 attack revealed bigger and more important issues at stake..Still, some Democratic operatives believe the political payoff could be substantial, both in energizing the party’s core supporters and in appealing to independent voters who may turn against Republicans based on what they see and hear...

Republican lawmakers have already begun pushing a counternarrative to dismiss the hearings as nothing more than political theater at a moment when Americans are more concerned with kitchen-table issues like the rising price of gas and a baby formula shortage....Instead of focusing on $5 gas, 6,000 illegal immigrants a day, record fentanyl deaths, or the violent criminals terrorizing America , (D)emocrats use taxpayer money on a TV producer for the prime time political infomercial from the Jan 6th circus,” Senator Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida, said on Twitter on Monday...

By Annie Karni and Luke Broadwater June 7, 2022

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/07/us/politics/jan-6-hearings-tv-democrats.html

********

Max Power, my friend, it's clear Team Blue and their propaganda wings are so tone deaf and arrogant, that they will speak the quiet parts out loud and expect no push back for it.

As if putting food on the table for their children is going to go on the backburner for the everyday working class so these high minded "more important issues at stake" like Democrats fearing a Mid Term massacre can take priority. These grifters desperately want to hold onto their cushy jobs so they can continue to ignore the basic needs of the masses.

As Enjeti pointed out - Just make the lives of every day people better and they'll have the time and energy to pay attention to you.

Our tax dollars, Max, our blood and sweat, paid out so a schlock ineptTV producer can show up and try to turn this entire farce into the next American Idol or America's Got Talent.

I don't agree with what Trump did on J6. But if there was a means to put him in prison, it would have happened already. If Democrats had anything substantial, they should have pushed it as soon as possible, not for some ill conceived timed marketing strategy.

You can only shout "We finally got him!" so many times before people expect you to s---- or get off the pot.

 
Both point out that the 2nd night of the J6 hearings watched it's audience CUT IN HALF. This is with widespread prime time coverage and a coordinated push by literally every major broadcast network in the country plus the full weight of most of Big Social Media behind it.
I had to double check, but the 2nd hearing started at 10 am, not at night. Not sure what the ratings are usually like at 10am during a weekday.

 
Why does it have to be either/or?  Why should television ratings of the public determine whether something is important or not?  

 
Why does it have to be either/or?  Why should television ratings of the public determine whether something is important or not?  


Direct Headline: Ratings slump for second Jan. 6 hearing as around 10 million tune in

The second public hearing of the House select committee investigating last year’s Capitol riot drew around 10 million total viewers Monday, less than half the audience that watched the committee’s primetime opening presentation last week.

The preliminary numbers from Nielsen Media Research incorporated viewership across cable news, as well as ABC and CBS properties. Numbers from NBC News were not immediately available Tuesday.

By Mark Moore June 14, 2022 4:37pm

https://nypost.com/2022/06/14/ratings-slump-for-second-jan-6-hearing-as-around-10-million-tune-in/

********

It indicates that a majority of the public doesn't care. Or has more pressing issues like inflation that need immediate attention.

Team Blue only had one chance at this. From the opening bell, they needed a knockout shot fired in the first ten minutes at the first hearing. They needed a 'smoking gun' to assure Trump would be put in prison once this moved past the Court Of Public Opinion and into a court of law.

This isn't just mindless political theater, it's badly constructed political theater.

 
This is another example of the extremes of each party yelling the loudest. There is nothing wrong with what he said.

Saagar is actually a very balanced commentator in my opinion. He is about as middle of the road as you're going to get in this industry. 
Breaking Points is by far my favorite news source and commentary.  Krystal and Saagar are both great.  

 
Amused to Death said:
You know who's watching? The DOJ. They're watching.
I’ll take an unarmed protest over an obviously stolen election seriously when the DOJ prosecutes the militantly armed BLM Marxist terrorists and Antifa goons who did billions of dollars of damage to our cities. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Imagine being so 

Thank you. It seems some aren't willing to walk and chew gum at the same time; likely because one makes their tribe look bad. 


VIDEO: WATCH: Rep. Matt Gaetz’s full questioning of committee lawyers | Trump's first impeachment Dec 9, 2019 PBS NewsHour

Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., questioned House Judiciary and Intelligence committee lawyers on Dec. 9. The questioning of Republican counsel Stephen Castor and Democratic counsel Daniel Goldman came during a House Judiciary Committee hearing that is part of the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. The Judiciary and Intelligence committees have led the probe, hearing testimony from witnesses and legal experts about Trump’s conduct. Democrats are currently drafting the articles of impeachment, on which House lawmakers are anticipated to vote in the coming weeks. The impeachment case has revolved around a July 25 phone call in which Trump asked the president of Ukraine to investigate former vice president and 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgQiv9uSmEM

House Judiciary Committee Impeachment Hearing Transcript – Day 2 / Dec 9, 2019

Matt Gaetz: (01:14:56)
Mr. Goldman, same question. Do you make political donations? As a matter of facts you’ve given tens of thousands of dollars to Democrats. Right? I just want to know the number, I don’t really care the basis. Have you given more than a 100,000 bucks to democrats?… and Mr. Burke gave a whole more than a 100,000. Do you think if you’d given more money, you might’ve been able to ask questions and answer them like Mr. Burke did? I guess it’s something you’re still pondering. Mr. Castor, have you ever tweeted anything at the president? Mr Goldman, same question.


Mr. Goldman: (01:15:49)
I have made a number of tweets in my private capacity before I came to this job when I was working in the media. Yes.


Matt Gaetz: (01:15:57)
As a matter of fact this is one of those tweets, right? And you said nothing in the dossier is proven false, but in fact the dossier said that there was a Russian consulate in Miami when there isn’t. The dossier said that Michael Cohen had a meeting in Prague when he didn’t. The dossier said that Michael Cohen’s wife was Russian, she’s in fact Ukrainian. So as we sit here today where you’ve, I guess got a tweet mentioning a pee tape presenting yourself not as a partisan hired by the Democrats to pursue the president. Do you regret this tweet?


Mr. Goldman: (01:16:32)
Sir, I would be happy to put this investigation up with any of the nonpartisan investigator, I did during-


Matt Gaetz: (01:16:38)
I just want to know if you regret the tweet Mr. Goldman? You either regret it or you don’t regret it...I guess you don’t want to answer the question. You know what, Mr. Chairman, earlier in this hearing you said in your opening statement that there is nothing more urgent than impeachment right now. This is the most urgent thing we could possibly do. Well, you know what? If you’re a senior right now and you can’t afford your prescription drugs, that’s more urgent than this. If you’re a manufacturer wanting to dominate the Western hemisphere with the passage of the US MCA, that is more urgent....If you’re a farmer who wants to open markets so that your family can survive and thrive, that is a lot more urgent than this partisan process. If you’re a desperate family member watching someone succumb to addiction, solving the opioid problem, probably more urgent than this partisan impeachment. If you’re a member of the next generation dealing with the challenges of extinction and climate change, a budget that’s out of control, driving up the credit card of young people in this country and what they’ll have to pay back as a consequence of our poor decisions, likely more urgent.


Matt Gaetz: (01:17:44)
But House Democrats have failed at all of these things. Matter of fact, I’d say the only thing under the Christmas tree for most Americans would be a lump of coal, but I think they’re against coal too. The only thing under the Christmas tree for Americans would be impeachment and investigations. I’ve heard over and over Democrats say that this is all about the president’s personal interest and that he abandoned the national interest and it begs an analysis of how the nation is doing. In November 266,000 jobs created, 80,000 over the average. Half a million more manufacturing jobs in the Trump presidency, 700,000 construction jobs. We are doing better than ever before. The American people are thriving. Why won’t you help us move along the critical issues that are far more important than your partisan impeachment(?)


https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/house-judiciary-committee-impeachment-hearing-transcript-day-2

********

Speaking of making the tribe "look bad", even back in 2019, and even from the scandal plagued and reviled Matt Gaetz, the question was still raised - Is going after Donald Trump in the most partisan way possible more important than the US economy and what happens to working class every day Americans at the ground level?  Because it's been proven over and over that Team Blue can't get a conviction on Trump, but there's still a chance to help working class people TODAY.

Do you want to answer that?

 
Trump's own White House lawyer suggested crimes may have been committed by those around the President. They should be investigated and prosecuted for all crimes if found guilty.

Law and order and such.


Direct Headline: Adam Schiff Insists He ‘Has Evidence’ Trump Was Involved In Plot To Overturn Election — But Won’t Reveal It

....“Yes. We’ll show evidence of the president’s involvement in this scheme,” Schiff replied. “We’ll also, again, show evidence about what his own lawyers came to think about this scheme. And we’ll show courageous state officials who stood up and said they wouldn’t go along with this plan to either call legislatures back into session or decertify the results for Joe Biden....”

“You know, I don’t want to get ahead of our hearing,” Schiff replied. “We’ll show during a hearing what the president’s role was in trying to get states to name alternate slates of electors, how that scheme depended initially on hopes that the legislatures would reconvene and bless it and he pressed forward with it anyway....”

“Will we see he directed it?” (CNN Dana) Bash interrupted, repeating the question once Schiff finished his thought. “Will we see that he directed it?”

“I don’t want to get ahead of the role,” Schiff said again....

By Virginia Kruta Jun 19, 2022 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/adam-schiff-insists-he-has-evidence-trump-was-involved-in-plot-to-overturn-election-but-wont-reveal-it

VIDEO: 'Everyone Knew It Was False!' Jim Jordan Tears Into Schiff In Defense Of Trump Dec 9, 2021

Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) speaks in strong defense of former President Trump during a House floor speech debating a bill that would curb presidential powers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Db0y0Zmm00g

*********

"Maybe instead of another bill that attacks Donald Trump, maybe we should focus on the things that the American people care about..." - Jim Jordan

Schiff promised a whistle blower and nothing. Schiff promised he'd get Trump put in chains and nothing. Schiff now saying he's finally got the smoking gun evidence and we are supposed to believe him now?

Enjeti points out and Jim Jordan points out and I'm going to point out again that you can't have endless investigations.

At some point, the investigations are no longer about finding the truth, it's just a battering ram to see what can stick on a wall when it's clear nothing can stick on a wall except trying to spin the narrative away from the disaster of this entire Biden Administration.

 
Both are important threats and they’re connected. 
 

The more gas prices and inflation rises, the more the general public will be willing to ignore threats to democracy and express favor of “strong men” who they believe can solve our economic problems. That’s been the history of how pretty much every dictatorship in the 20th century occurred. 

 
Like hank said, if you’re a capitalist, quite complaining about the price of gas.


Cool.  Then we shouldn't be hearing anything about the price of health care, college and your favorite soy product either.  :thumbup:

Just accept it and move on.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Both are important threats and they’re connected. 
 

The more gas prices and inflation rises, the more the general public will be willing to ignore threats to democracy and express favor of “strong men” who they believe can solve our economic problems. That’s been the history of how pretty much every dictatorship in the 20th century occurred. 
Sounds like guns also.  Give up our rights to feel safe.

 
There is a reason why so many tweets from Hollywood elites are ridiculed.

They deserve it.


I think he's got a point.  Oil companies are going to post huge profits this year off the backs of high gas prices - but everyone is going to blame their opportunism (capitalism) on the presidential administration.

Also of note, is the GOP voted down rules about price gouging for industries including oil.

 
Both are important threats and they’re connected. 
 

The more gas prices and inflation rises, the more the general public will be willing to ignore threats to democracy and express favor of “strong men” who they believe can solve our economic problems. That’s been the history of how pretty much every dictatorship in the 20th century occurred. 


I'm having a hard time believing this. Seems a bit hyperbolic and maybe just a little over the top.

Of course, if this is the case can you blame them?  You're seeing the results on the opposite of a "strong man" - Joe Biden - and it's hurting people hard.  People vote with what directly affects them.

 
I think he's got a point.  Oil companies are going to post huge profits this year off the backs of high gas prices - but everyone is going to blame their opportunism (capitalism) on the presidential administration.

Also of note, is the GOP voted down rules about price gouging for industries including oil.
What about every other company that raised prices in the last two years thru various methods?  I asked a couple of times what are acceptable profits for a corporation and no one had a answer.  If companies are saving money by not exploring, of course the profits are going up.  I sold out basically every week for the first year of COVID, am I supposed to lower prices and work for less?  The government is so out of touch on this topic.  

 
What about every other company that raised prices in the last two years thru various methods?  I asked a couple of times what are acceptable profits for a corporation and no one had a answer.  If companies are saving money by not exploring, of course the profits are going up.  I sold out basically every week for the first year of COVID, am I supposed to lower prices and work for less?  The government is so out of touch on this topic.  
the American way is to get every penny you can while you can.

If I were king, I would look at rescinding drill permits.  Establish a partnership with an existing gas chain to drill those sites and control the price.  Government portion of proceeds goes to fund government or reduce debt.  But big oil greases too many pockets to make that happen.  And that’s how the gop likes it

 
I might be in the minority but nothing is more important to me as an American than exposing a despot trying to circumvent the US presidential election and remain in power.  

If we go down a path where it is okay for an incumbent president to tell his VP to not certify the results of states that he loses then what is the point in even having elections or  a constitution?   

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I might be in the minority but nothing is more important to me as an American than exposing a despot trying to circumvent the US presidential election and remain in power.  

If we go down a path where it is okay for an incumbent president to tell his VP to not certify the results of states that he loses then what is the point in even having elections or  a constitution?   
I wonder how the general view would be if it were the likable Obama doing it instead of the hated Trump.  

 
I wonder how the general view would be if it were the likable Obama doing it instead of the hated Trump.  


I am sure they would have been totally cool if Obama said that the 2016 election was rigged and told Biden to throw out the results of states that Hillary lost.   

Then again gas only $2.20 a gallon in 2016 so maybe then it would have been important.  Does anyone know what the price of gas tthreshold is for caring about attempts to overturn a presidential election?

 
I am sure they would have been totally cool if Obama said that the 2016 election was rigged and told Biden to throw out the results of states that Hillary lost.   

Then again gas only $2.20 a gallon in 2016 so maybe then it would have been important.  Does anyone know what the price of gas tthreshold is for caring about attempts to overturn a presidential election?
It’s not a either/or issue for me between inflation and thr election.  

 
I do recall people yearning for Michelle to run so her husband could stay on.  I also miss the days of other qualified people like Oprah and Mark Zuckerberg to run for president.

 
Of course not, it is absurd.   Both are important.
But it sucks to tell customers that their prices are going up for the 4th time.  This is the pushback that Biden gets and deservingly so.  If he showed some empathy toward that side, it may help sell the 1/6 side.  

 
Forget the media and be honest.

How many people in your day to day life has ever mentioned Jan. 6?  Even once?  To me zero. 

How many people in your day to day life have complained and are concerned about gas prices?  To me almost everyone.

 
But it sucks to tell customers that their prices are going up for the 4th time.  This is the pushback that Biden gets and deservingly so.  If he showed some empathy toward that side, it may help sell the 1/6 side.  


Maybe but Biden showing empathy is not going to mean squat to the guy filling his tank with gas.  Biden needs to act but the reality is that he is going to need congress to do anything meaningful that will have an impact on the price of gas.

None of this has anything to do with Jan 6 though

 
Forget the media and be honest.

How many people in your day to day life has ever mentioned Jan. 6?  Even once?  To me zero. 

How many people in your day to day life have complained and are concerned about gas prices?  To me almost everyone.


On Jan 7 no one was talking about the price of gas but everyone talking about Jan 6.   In a year form now it will be something else.  It is all relative.

I understand that inflation and gas prices are important to us all but that doesn't mean that an attempt to overturn the 2020 election results should be swept under the rug.  

 
I think when people talk and frame the issue in this either/or way they really display a fundamental underestimation of the public. The public can damn well be infuriated by the cost of living going up like it has while also being infuriated by a former sitting president trying to overturn a perfectly valid election. 

This is where the "if you're not outraged, you're not paying attention" bumper sticker should go. Right over these thoughts of either/or. 

 
On Jan 7 no one was talking about the price of gas but everyone talking about Jan 6.   In a year form now it will be something else.  It is all relative.

I understand that inflation and gas prices are important to us all but that doesn't mean that an attempt to overturn the 2020 election results should be swept under the rug.  


Totally agree, but in reality no election was ever going to be overturned by a couple hundred idiots. Put them in jail.

 
Totally agree, but in reality no election was ever going to be overturned by a couple hundred idiots. Put them in jail.


Agreed but the problem was not the couple hundred idiots.   

It was the people behind the scheme to come up with lies about rigged elections, pressuring state election officials to find votes, fake electors, instructing the VP to illegally overturn election results.   This was the real threat and they need to be exposed for the traitors that they are.

 
Agreed but the problem was not the couple hundred idiots.   

It was the people behind the scheme to come up with lies about rigged elections, pressuring state election officials to find votes, fake electors, instructing the VP to illegally overturn election results.   This was the real threat and they need to be exposed for the traitors that they are.


Ok with that.   

All government has corruption but I agree this needs to be dealt with.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top