2023-24 NBA (Playoffs!) Thread: Mavs - Boston it is (79 Viewers)

[Major]

Haliburton reminds me of more athletic, but worse shooting young Steve Nash. I am not sure if he will ever reach prime Nash, but still really good.

I don’t think he’s more athletic.

Or worse shooting

Nash was an elite shooter, Haliburton is average to slightly above. I kind of put their athletic ability and defense together. Nash was one if the worst defenders in the league.

Nash’s True Shooting Percentage (TSP) was .605. Haliburton’s is .604.

Tyrese averages more assists per game than Nash did, more rebounds per game, half a block more per game, and less turnovers per game. He averages more points per game. He has a higher PER (20.3 versus 20.0).

Nash’s effective FG percentage (which takes into account 3 pointers being worth more points than 2 pointers) was .556. Haliburton is .572.

Most of the stats seems to indicate that they’re pretty similar shooters/offensive producers.

That's interesting. Just from eye test and memory, I remember Nash being a far more efficient shooter than Halliburton.

 

[GroveDiesel]

Haliburton reminds me of more athletic, but worse shooting young Steve Nash. I am not sure if he will ever reach prime Nash, but still really good.

I don’t think he’s more athletic.

Or worse shooting

Nash was an elite shooter, Haliburton is average to slightly above. I kind of put their athletic ability and defense together. Nash was one if the worst defenders in the league.

Nash’s True Shooting Percentage (TSP) was .605. Haliburton’s is .604.

Tyrese averages more assists per game than Nash did, more rebounds per game, half a block more per game, and less turnovers per game. He averages more points per game. He has a higher PER (20.3 versus 20.0).

Nash’s effective FG percentage (which takes into account 3 pointers being worth more points than 2 pointers) was .556. Haliburton is .572.

Most of the stats seems to indicate that they’re pretty similar shooters/offensive st producer

That is what I am saying, but pretty much everyone's career averages go down at the end of their career. We are comparing Haliburton's averages without that back end. So I give the slight edge to Nash.

Haliburton’s rookie season is 25% of his stats right now. If we compare Haliburton’s first 4 years in the NBA to Nash’s first 4, Haliburton obliterates Nash.

I mean, yeah, if we’re comparing Nash’s MVP seasons to Haliburton right now, then sure, peak of his career MVP seasons Steve Nash is better than what Haliburton has done so far. Haliburton’s play right now is clearly not the same as MVP level Nash. But it’s trending in that direction and a lot of his numbers are are at least approaching that elite territory.

 

[GroveDiesel]

Haliburton reminds me of more athletic, but worse shooting young Steve Nash. I am not sure if he will ever reach prime Nash, but still really good.

I don’t think he’s more athletic.

Or worse shooting

Nash was an elite shooter, Haliburton is average to slightly above. I kind of put their athletic ability and defense together. Nash was one if the worst defenders in the league.

Nash’s True Shooting Percentage (TSP) was .605. Haliburton’s is .604.

Tyrese averages more assists per game than Nash did, more rebounds per game, half a block more per game, and less turnovers per game. He averages more points per game. He has a higher PER (20.3 versus 20.0).

Nash’s effective FG percentage (which takes into account 3 pointers being worth more points than 2 pointers) was .556. Haliburton is .572.

Most of the stats seems to indicate that they’re pretty similar shooters/offensive producers.

That's interesting. Just from eye test and memory, I remember Nash being a far more efficient shooter than Halliburton.

His 8 year stint in Phoenix was really really good and he was at his absolute elite peak. His numbers there are all elite. His stats from that period are definitely better than Haliburton’s. And of course that 8 amazing years is what he is and should be remembered for. That’s a heckuva run.

It just remains to me seen if a still young Haliburton can take his game from Nash’s career average up another level to Nash’s elite.

 

[msudaisy26]

Haliburton reminds me of more athletic, but worse shooting young Steve Nash. I am not sure if he will ever reach prime Nash, but still really good.

I don’t think he’s more athletic.

Or worse shooting

Nash was an elite shooter, Haliburton is average to slightly above. I kind of put their athletic ability and defense together. Nash was one if the worst defenders in the league.

Nash’s True Shooting Percentage (TSP) was .605. Haliburton’s is .604.

Tyrese averages more assists per game than Nash did, more rebounds per game, half a block more per game, and less turnovers per game. He averages more points per game. He has a higher PER (20.3 versus 20.0).

Nash’s effective FG percentage (which takes into account 3 pointers being worth more points than 2 pointers) was .556. Haliburton is .572.

Most of the stats seems to indicate that they’re pretty similar shooters/offensive st producer

That is what I am saying, but pretty much everyone's career averages go down at the end of their career. We are comparing Haliburton's averages without that back end. So I give the slight edge to Nash.

Haliburton’s rookie season is 25% of his stats right now. If we compare Haliburton’s first 4 years in the NBA to Nash’s first 4, Haliburton obliterates Nash.

I mean, yeah, if we’re comparing Nash’s MVP seasons to Haliburton right now, then sure, peak of his career MVP seasons Steve Nash is better than what Haliburton has done so far. Haliburton’s play right now is clearly not the same as MVP level Nash. But it’s trending in that direction and a lot of his numbers are are at least approaching that elite territory.

I was comparing Nash with Dallas before he blew up in Phoenix.

 

[offdee]

So what time are the 2 game 7s on tomorrow?

 

[offdee]

So what time are the 2 game 7s on tomorrow?

Found this…

The Pacers defeated the Knicks, 116 -103 on Friday to force a Game 7 in their series on Sunday. Those two Eastern Conference teams will play at 2:30 p.m. CT — and the Timberwolves and Nuggets will tip off at 7 p.m. CT. The Wolves game would be televised on TNT.

 

[Spartans Rule]

Haliburton reminds me of more athletic, but worse shooting young Steve Nash. I am not sure if he will ever reach prime Nash, but still really good.

I don’t think he’s more athletic.

Or worse shooting

Nash was an elite shooter, Haliburton is average to slightly above. I kind of put their athletic ability and defense together. Nash was one if the worst defenders in the league.

Nash’s True Shooting Percentage (TSP) was .605. Haliburton’s is .604.

Tyrese averages more assists per game than Nash did, more rebounds per game, half a block more per game, and less turnovers per game. He averages more points per game. He has a higher PER (20.3 versus 20.0).

Nash’s effective FG percentage (which takes into account 3 pointers being worth more points than 2 pointers) was .556. Haliburton is .572.

Most of the stats seems to indicate that they’re pretty similar shooters/offensive producers.

We’re also in the basketball equivalent of the steroid era in terms of inflated offensive statistics.

League average TS% during Nash’s career was .530. For Halliburton’s career it’s .575.

 

[trader jake]

Haliburton reminds me of more athletic, but worse shooting young Steve Nash. I am not sure if he will ever reach prime Nash, but still really good.

I don’t think he’s more athletic.

Or worse shooting

Nash was an elite shooter, Haliburton is average to slightly above. I kind of put their athletic ability and defense together. Nash was one if the worst defenders in the league.

Nash’s True Shooting Percentage (TSP) was .605. Haliburton’s is .604.

Tyrese averages more assists per game than Nash did, more rebounds per game, half a block more per game, and less turnovers per game. He averages more points per game. He has a higher PER (20.3 versus 20.0).

Nash’s effective FG percentage (which takes into account 3 pointers being worth more points than 2 pointers) was .556. Haliburton is .572.

Most of the stats seems to indicate that they’re pretty similar shooters/offensive st producer

That is what I am saying, but pretty much everyone's career averages go down at the end of their career. We are comparing Haliburton's averages without that back end. So I give the slight edge to Nash.

Haliburton’s rookie season is 25% of his stats right now. If we compare Haliburton’s first 4 years in the NBA to Nash’s first 4, Haliburton obliterates Nash.

I mean, yeah, if we’re comparing Nash’s MVP seasons to Haliburton right now, then sure, peak of his career MVP seasons Steve Nash is better than what Haliburton has done so far. Haliburton’s play right now is clearly not the same as MVP level Nash. But it’s trending in that direction and a lot of his numbers are are at least approaching that elite territory.

I was comparing Nash with Dallas before he blew up in Phoenix.

Dallas had the opportunity to sigh Nash for a reasonable contract before he went to Phoenix. See also: Brunson to New York.

History doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes.

So what time are the 2 game 7s on tomorrow?

IND @ NYK 2:30est ABC
MIN @ DEN 7:00est TNT

 

[Frostillicus]

Man watching Joker at 2 am in a Serbian bar sounds amazing.

That place might get really rowdy if they lose though.

No chance they lose.

 

[msudaisy26]

Man watching Joker at 2 am in a Serbian bar sounds amazing.

That place might get really rowdy if they lose though.

No chance they lose.

Am I the only person that thinks this a coin flip?

 

[Deamon]

Man watching Joker at 2 am in a Serbian bar sounds amazing.

Haha that's the plan, as long as it's actually showing somewhere that late on a Sunday night. Belgrade has a big late night party scene though so I could see them keeping places open until 5.

 

[Capella]

Man watching Joker at 2 am in a Serbian bar sounds amazing.

That place might get really rowdy if they lose though.

No chance they lose.

Am I the only person that thinks this a coin flip?

Definitely not a coin flip but crazier things have happened

 

[msudaisy26]

Man watching Joker at 2 am in a Serbian bar sounds amazing.

That place might get really rowdy if they lose though.

No chance they lose.

Am I the only person that thinks this a coin flip?

Definitely not a coin flip but crazier things have happened

Am I better T Wolves fan than @Frostillicus ?

 

[identikit]

Man watching Joker at 2 am in a Serbian bar sounds amazing.

That place might get really rowdy if they lose though.

No chance they lose.

Am I the only person that thinks this a coin flip?

Definitely not a coin flip but crazier things have happened

Am I better T Wolves fan than @Frostillicus ?

Unpossible

 

[SWC]

Man watching Joker at 2 am in a Serbian bar sounds amazing.

Haha that's the plan, as long as it's actually showing somewhere that late on a Sunday night. Belgrade has a big late night party scene though so I could see them keeping places open until 5.

i am so jealous of you but hope you have a great take that to the bank brohan

 

[Frostillicus]

Man watching Joker at 2 am in a Serbian bar sounds amazing.

That place might get really rowdy if they lose though.

No chance they lose.

Am I the only person that thinks this a coin flip?

Only if both sides say Denver.

 

[Kev4029]

Souvenir shops everywhere here selling magnets, check out the ones this place had, wtf?

I bought this one lol

That is super cool. I bet you could buy two or three and hold them ransom to a couple of guys in here.

Cough @Jayrod @Kev4029

Yeah, that thing is cool as ****. I'm hoping to make it to the Balkans eventually, although Croatia would be the highlight.

 

[Kev4029]

Man watching Joker at 2 am in a Serbian bar sounds amazing.

Haha that's the plan, as long as it's actually showing somewhere that late on a Sunday night. Belgrade has a big late night party scene though so I could see them keeping places open until 5.

I know last season they were having watch parties all over the place. I can imagine this playoffs is any different. Basketball is their favorite sport and Jokic is their favorite player.

 

[Kev4029]

Haliburton reminds me of more athletic, but worse shooting young Steve Nash. I am not sure if he will ever reach prime Nash, but still really good.

I don’t think he’s more athletic.

Or worse shooting

Nash was an elite shooter, Haliburton is average to slightly above. I kind of put their athletic ability and defense together. Nash was one if the worst defenders in the league.

Nash’s True Shooting Percentage (TSP) was .605. Haliburton’s is .604.

Tyrese averages more assists per game than Nash did, more rebounds per game, half a block more per game, and less turnovers per game. He averages more points per game. He has a higher PER (20.3 versus 20.0).

Nash’s effective FG percentage (which takes into account 3 pointers being worth more points than 2 pointers) was .556. Haliburton is .572.

Most of the stats seems to indicate that they’re pretty similar shooters/offensive producers.

That's interesting. Just from eye test and memory, I remember Nash being a far more efficient shooter than Halliburton.

His 8 year stint in Phoenix was really really good and he was at his absolute elite peak. His numbers there are all elite. His stats from that period are definitely better than Haliburton’s. And of course that 8 amazing years is what he is and should be remembered for. That’s a heckuva run.

It just remains to me seen if a still young Haliburton can take his game from Nash’s career average up another level to Nash’s elite.

I think Nash's two MVPs were two of the worst MVP season of the post Jordan era, but he very much revolutionized the NBA. Comparing Steve Nash to what amounts to the deadball era of the NBA to comparing Halliburton to what amounts to (as somebody else mentioned) the steroid era of the NBA is not fair.

 

[Alex P Keaton]

im not sure how i am going to reconcile wanting the timberwolves to win when i want the entire state they are based in to be bulldozed into a giant bass fishin hole but trust me brohans i will figure out a way take that to the bank

This might be my favorite FBGs post of all time

 

[NewlyRetired]

Basketball is their favorite sport and Jokic is their favorite player.

Did this change recently? I always thought Football (soccer) was their favorite sport?

11 Most Popular Sports in Serbia

Ever wondered about Serbia's heartbeat?

sportsfoundation.org

Serbia, the country of sport: part II | StudyInSerbia

 

[Alex P Keaton]

Haliburton reminds me of more athletic, but worse shooting young Steve Nash. I am not sure if he will ever reach prime Nash, but still really good.

I don’t think he’s more athletic.

Or worse shooting

Nash was an elite shooter, Haliburton is average to slightly above. I kind of put their athletic ability and defense together. Nash was one if the worst defenders in the league.

Nash’s True Shooting Percentage (TSP) was .605. Haliburton’s is .604.

Tyrese averages more assists per game than Nash did, more rebounds per game, half a block more per game, and less turnovers per game. He averages more points per game. He has a higher PER (20.3 versus 20.0).

Nash’s effective FG percentage (which takes into account 3 pointers being worth more points than 2 pointers) was .556. Haliburton is .572.

Most of the stats seems to indicate that they’re pretty similar shooters/offensive producers.

That's interesting. Just from eye test and memory, I remember Nash being a far more efficient shooter than Halliburton.

That’s because he was. Nash was a 42.8% career 3-pt shooter. Halliburton is 39.3%. Nash shot 90.4% on FTs for his career. Halliburton is at 85.6% today.

Both are far above average, but Nash was clearly a superior shooter, particularly when you account for the era he played in vs today.

 

[the moops]

Haliburton reminds me of more athletic, but worse shooting young Steve Nash. I am not sure if he will ever reach prime Nash, but still really good.

I don’t think he’s more athletic.

Or worse shooting

Nash was an elite shooter, Haliburton is average to slightly above. I kind of put their athletic ability and defense together. Nash was one if the worst defenders in the league.

Nash’s True Shooting Percentage (TSP) was .605. Haliburton’s is .604.

Tyrese averages more assists per game than Nash did, more rebounds per game, half a block more per game, and less turnovers per game. He averages more points per game. He has a higher PER (20.3 versus 20.0).

Nash’s effective FG percentage (which takes into account 3 pointers being worth more points than 2 pointers) was .556. Haliburton is .572.

Most of the stats seems to indicate that they’re pretty similar shooters/offensive producers.

That's interesting. Just from eye test and memory, I remember Nash being a far more efficient shooter than Halliburton.

That’s because he was. Nash was a 42.8% career 3-pt shooter. Halliburton is 39.3%. Nash shot 90.4% on FTs for his career. Halliburton is at 85.6% today.

Both are far above average, but Nash was clearly a superior shooter, particularly when you account for the era he played in vs today.

Haliburton is launching from 27 feet and throwing up way more per game. Strictly looking at percentages doesn't tell the full story

 

[msudaisy26]

Haliburton reminds me of more athletic, but worse shooting young Steve Nash. I am not sure if he will ever reach prime Nash, but still really good.

I don’t think he’s more athletic.

Or worse shooting

Nash was an elite shooter, Haliburton is average to slightly above. I kind of put their athletic ability and defense together. Nash was one if the worst defenders in the league.

Nash’s True Shooting Percentage (TSP) was .605. Haliburton’s is .604.

Tyrese averages more assists per game than Nash did, more rebounds per game, half a block more per game, and less turnovers per game. He averages more points per game. He has a higher PER (20.3 versus 20.0).

Nash’s effective FG percentage (which takes into account 3 pointers being worth more points than 2 pointers) was .556. Haliburton is .572.

Most of the stats seems to indicate that they’re pretty similar shooters/offensive producers.

That's interesting. Just from eye test and memory, I remember Nash being a far more efficient shooter than Halliburton.

That’s because he was. Nash was a 42.8% career 3-pt shooter. Halliburton is 39.3%. Nash shot 90.4% on FTs for his career. Halliburton is at 85.6% today.

Both are far above average, but Nash was clearly a superior shooter, particularly when you account for the era he played in vs today.

Haliburton is launching from 27 feet and throwing up way more per game. Strictly looking at percentages doesn't tell the full story

Selecting good shots is part of being a good shooter. Haliburton is still learning that.

I actually think Haliburton might end up having a better career than Nash, but I have a difficult time believing his peak will be as good.

 

[Major]

Haliburton reminds me of more athletic, but worse shooting young Steve Nash. I am not sure if he will ever reach prime Nash, but still really good.

I don’t think he’s more athletic.

Or worse shooting

Nash was an elite shooter, Haliburton is average to slightly above. I kind of put their athletic ability and defense together. Nash was one if the worst defenders in the league.

Nash’s True Shooting Percentage (TSP) was .605. Haliburton’s is .604.

Tyrese averages more assists per game than Nash did, more rebounds per game, half a block more per game, and less turnovers per game. He averages more points per game. He has a higher PER (20.3 versus 20.0).

Nash’s effective FG percentage (which takes into account 3 pointers being worth more points than 2 pointers) was .556. Haliburton is .572.

Most of the stats seems to indicate that they’re pretty similar shooters/offensive producers.

That's interesting. Just from eye test and memory, I remember Nash being a far more efficient shooter than Halliburton.

That’s because he was. Nash was a 42.8% career 3-pt shooter. Halliburton is 39.3%. Nash shot 90.4% on FTs for his career. Halliburton is at 85.6% today.

Both are far above average, but Nash was clearly a superior shooter, particularly when you account for the era he played in vs today.

Haliburton is launching from 27 feet and throwing up way more per game. Strictly looking at percentages doesn't tell the full story

Selecting good shots is part of being a good shooter. Haliburton is still learning that.

I actually think Haliburton might end up having a better career than Nash, but I have a difficult time believing his peak will be as good.

Possibly but no way he's winning 2 MVP awards.

 

[msudaisy26]

Haliburton reminds me of more athletic, but worse shooting young Steve Nash. I am not sure if he will ever reach prime Nash, but still really good.

I don’t think he’s more athletic.

Or worse shooting

Nash was an elite shooter, Haliburton is average to slightly above. I kind of put their athletic ability and defense together. Nash was one if the worst defenders in the league.

Nash’s True Shooting Percentage (TSP) was .605. Haliburton’s is .604.

Tyrese averages more assists per game than Nash did, more rebounds per game, half a block more per game, and less turnovers per game. He averages more points per game. He has a higher PER (20.3 versus 20.0).

Nash’s effective FG percentage (which takes into account 3 pointers being worth more points than 2 pointers) was .556. Haliburton is .572.

Most of the stats seems to indicate that they’re pretty similar shooters/offensive producers.

That's interesting. Just from eye test and memory, I remember Nash being a far more efficient shooter than Halliburton.

That’s because he was. Nash was a 42.8% career 3-pt shooter. Halliburton is 39.3%. Nash shot 90.4% on FTs for his career. Halliburton is at 85.6% today.

Both are far above average, but Nash was clearly a superior shooter, particularly when you account for the era he played in vs today.

Haliburton is launching from 27 feet and throwing up way more per game. Strictly looking at percentages doesn't tell the full story

Selecting good shots is part of being a good shooter. Haliburton is still learning that.

I actually think Haliburton might end up having a better career than Nash, but I have a difficult time believing his peak will be as good.

Possibly but no way he's winning 2 MVP awards.

True, but I am with Kev on this one. Nash should have one MVP at best.

 

[Major]

Haliburton reminds me of more athletic, but worse shooting young Steve Nash. I am not sure if he will ever reach prime Nash, but still really good.

I don’t think he’s more athletic.

Or worse shooting

Nash was an elite shooter, Haliburton is average to slightly above. I kind of put their athletic ability and defense together. Nash was one if the worst defenders in the league.

Nash’s True Shooting Percentage (TSP) was .605. Haliburton’s is .604.

Tyrese averages more assists per game than Nash did, more rebounds per game, half a block more per game, and less turnovers per game. He averages more points per game. He has a higher PER (20.3 versus 20.0).

Nash’s effective FG percentage (which takes into account 3 pointers being worth more points than 2 pointers) was .556. Haliburton is .572.

Most of the stats seems to indicate that they’re pretty similar shooters/offensive producers.

That's interesting. Just from eye test and memory, I remember Nash being a far more efficient shooter than Halliburton.

That’s because he was. Nash was a 42.8% career 3-pt shooter. Halliburton is 39.3%. Nash shot 90.4% on FTs for his career. Halliburton is at 85.6% today.

Both are far above average, but Nash was clearly a superior shooter, particularly when you account for the era he played in vs today.

Haliburton is launching from 27 feet and throwing up way more per game. Strictly looking at percentages doesn't tell the full story

Selecting good shots is part of being a good shooter. Haliburton is still learning that.

I actually think Haliburton might end up having a better career than Nash, but I have a difficult time believing his peak will be as good.

Possibly but no way he's winning 2 MVP awards.

True, but I am with Kev on this one. Nash should have one MVP at best.

I'd agree with that as well but we can't rewrite history. Probably the least impressive 2x MVP winner but back to back nonetheless.

 

[the moops]

Probably the least impressive 2x MVP winner

No question. Probably closely followed by Karl Malone

 

[offdee]

IND @ NYK 2:30est ABC
MIN @ DEN 7:00est TNT

From what I’m seeing I don’t think this is correct. 3:30pm and 8pm ET, I believe is what it is.

I’m seeing 12:30 and 5pm Pacific time where I live (Vegas).

 

[Instinctive]

Hope game 6 goes well tonight. Feeling Kyrie game coming on. Will probably check in at half because I'm addicted to the FFA.

 

[Alex P Keaton]

Haliburton reminds me of more athletic, but worse shooting young Steve Nash. I am not sure if he will ever reach prime Nash, but still really good.

I don’t think he’s more athletic.

Or worse shooting

Nash was an elite shooter, Haliburton is average to slightly above. I kind of put their athletic ability and defense together. Nash was one if the worst defenders in the league.

Nash’s True Shooting Percentage (TSP) was .605. Haliburton’s is .604.

Tyrese averages more assists per game than Nash did, more rebounds per game, half a block more per game, and less turnovers per game. He averages more points per game. He has a higher PER (20.3 versus 20.0).

Nash’s effective FG percentage (which takes into account 3 pointers being worth more points than 2 pointers) was .556. Haliburton is .572.

Most of the stats seems to indicate that they’re pretty similar shooters/offensive producers.

That's interesting. Just from eye test and memory, I remember Nash being a far more efficient shooter than Halliburton.

That’s because he was. Nash was a 42.8% career 3-pt shooter. Halliburton is 39.3%. Nash shot 90.4% on FTs for his career. Halliburton is at 85.6% today.

Both are far above average, but Nash was clearly a superior shooter, particularly when you account for the era he played in vs today.

Haliburton is launching from 27 feet and throwing up way more per game. Strictly looking at percentages doesn't tell the full story

No doubt. Which is one of the reasons I included FTs. Would love to see advanced stats that make a case for Halliburton. Basic stats and eye test day Nash was better. But again, both are way above average.

 

[Capella]

Hope game 6 goes well tonight. Feeling Kyrie game coming on. Will probably check in at half because I'm addicted to the FFA.

Me too. I have the Mavs in 6 at +400

 

[Moe.]

My hopes are low. Feels like the Thunder will have to make a bunch of difficult shots to stay close. I took the Mavs -4.5, so lock it in that they will win but by 4 or less.

 

[Long Ball Larry]

OG and Josh Hart are going to take enough painkillers to kill an elephant tomorrow

 

[Mister CIA]

I don't like Karl Malone.

 

[identikit]

OKC not too nervous

So far

 

[Moe.]

Tony Brothers came to play tonight

 

[identikit]

Dort on 3s

 

[Moe.]

Dort on 3s

The wide open ones he’ll make, if he has the time to wind it up he’s a good shooter. For most of the series he’s getting those semi-contested looks which he just can’t make. They are going a little too overboard in letting him shoot imo

 

[identikit]

Buzzer beater!!

 

[msudaisy26]

Buzzer beater!!

That was nice.

 

[Long Ball Larry]

I guess Luka is back to complaining…

 

[identikit]

That T seemed a little quick

 

[msudaisy26]

That T seemed a little quick

Maybe it will make the game more enjoyable.

 

[msudaisy26]

Dort has a role as an NBA player, but not as a starter or even a guy that should average more than 4 or 5 shots a game.

 

[Instinctive]

Dallas finally shows some aggression after all the BS.

If they're gonna have a quick whistle you have to adjust and attack.

 

[msudaisy26]

Giddey and Dort should never be on the floor together. Even against each other.

 

[msudaisy26]

Dallas finally shows some aggression after all the BS.

If they're gonna have a quick whistle you have to adjust and attack.

Maybe don't turn the ball over 7 times in the first 14 minutes.

 

[Instinctive]

****. Lu. Dort.

 

[Instinctive]

Tony Brothers 2
Luka Doncic 0