Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Glad they got Robinson, I prefer him to Watkins. Burton is nice although a bit steep in price. Would love to see them get Richardson too if the price is right.
Well then aren't u contradicting yourself? You say trust Pace regarding his evaluation on a qb but not a safety at 1.3?
im trying to understand where you are coming from
You are missing the point. GMs reach all the time. I don't want to see the bears follow suit. Let some other team do so.
So what? I don't get how that makes a difference. If he's the best player at 3 then take him.
So which analysts are you referring to as idiots? Guys who worked for NFL teams as scouts, GMs, coaches? Because those are the guys I pay attention to. According to many of them, these QBs grade out at 2nd rounders, MAYBE late 1st at best. All have major holes. None are "franchise" QBs. So why...
The problem I have is forcing a QB at 3. None of these QBs are grading out high enough to use the 3rd pick on them. Seems really stupid to pick one that high. Do the Bears need a QB? Of course they do. But I'd much rather they take a safer blue chip player and select a qb with the 2.3 pick.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.