Recent content by acarey50

You’re the guy with the 1.01 - you should be asking for as much as you can if you are even interested in dealing. In your spot, no such thing as asking for too much. Assuming this is 1QB, MHJ fits nicely, as while you have depth, outside of Wilson and to an extent Metcalf, your WR room skews...

1 QB that's the fastest accept I would be clicking. 12 team or larger SF/2QB I'd probably need more details, but it's about the right price for Burrow, depending on what other assets you already have to rebuild with - basically, if you are already flush with draft capital, I probably don't do...

Yeah, I'm still a Javonte truther and I don't think I'd take that if I had the 4. Seems like one of those on paper it looks ok valuewise, but really in 1QB FFPC scoring those top 4 picks this year are worth a premium

It means there are significant contract differences between what is automatically committed to a 1st round pick vs. what you commit to a 2nd round pick. If they had 2-3 WRs in the similar tier, the difference in taking them at 32 with the last pick of the 1st round vs. 33 with the first pick of...

Could you unpack this a bit? We have progressive tax rates, so unless I am completely misreading what you are saying which is entirely possible, this doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense based on how we as a country calculate income tax.

You should really take the time to look at how much data you and your wife/kids are actually using so you can make an informed decision. I think you may be surprised at how much data even more basic things use up. Either check your bill, I believe that usually has the breakdown for each line...

How much data do you tend to use? Do you stream anything from your phone - TV, movies, Hulu, music, etc.? Do your kids? Do you use any social media that had a lot of pics/videos like Instagram, Facebook, TikTok? Do your kids? Do you use your phone for work where you are sending attachments...

Am I misreading this or are you saying that you'd pass on MHJ at 2 and 3 to take Nabers and Odunze, or did you mean to say that if he took MHJ you would take the two WRs? Regardless, I think in SF, if he takes Williams, you take MHJ and Daniels at 2 and 3, then your BPA at 5. If he takes MHJ...

Pretty sure he means all of the links that Faust puts up in all of the player threads on this board.

Non-PPR 14 teamer - 1 QB - Start 1 RB/1WR/3 flex, TE lumped in with WR, not a separate position. I've got a fairly young team, hoping for an aggressive rebuild - have the 6, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18 and 22 this year, and have 2 1sts next year. I dealt the 7 and 12 for the 1.03

NTTAWWT I kid - and agree that part of the fun of this game is being able to have players you actually like on your fantasy teams so you can root for them just that little extra bit more

But that also means it can present great value opportunities to deal for said picks pre-NFL draft.

Which is exactly why I put the qualifier in my response that the player I anticipated getting at 6 would have to improve my lineup more than the drop from Kincaid to my next TE to even consider dealing - guess I could have elaborated, as obviously you can dig in to flex considerations, etc. with...

For sure - Kelce is the one to try trade, though the current team dynamics matter. If you're win now then running double TE may be the move, but if you aren't a title contender, or could use the boost elsewhere, moving Kelce is the move to explore.

Agree - I have Kincaid in a 1QB TEP 16 teamer and unless I had another viable TE where I thought the 6 would improve me at another position more than my drop off from Kincaid to my other TE, I'm not sure I'd pull the trigger on it.